jason (61)
michael (35)
sharon (30)
andy (29)
daniel (27)
leslie (22)
tulipgirl (22)
brian (13)
ben (12)
foomonkey (10)
aj (6)
joe lance (6)
pudding (6)
jeff (5)
agirloutthere (4)
beck (4)
beth (4)
c.davis (4)
davidm. (4)
joe (4)
phil w (4)
rebecca (4)
aaron (3)
andy duncan (3)
hugo (3)
jeremy clifton (3)
joedumas (3)
joshua (3)
kevin (3)
I ate lunch with the leader of the free world. (45)
schappi, das kleine krokodil (41)
Last Gulfshore Baptist Assembly post: (maybe) (35)
The Olympic Spirit (29)
breastfeeding makes her uncomfortable (17)
gay marriage (15)
The Homebirth: Killian and Mommy (14)
Offical Whitehouse Photo (11)
Homeschoolers against Huckabee (11)
target boycott (10)
I'm Looking for a Joseph (10)
Oh yeah, we are having a homebirth (10)
Evangelicals, Huckabee, and a moment of weakness (10)
Robertson vs. Chaves (9)
the new pair of shoes (9)
cat stevens (8)
elliot james (8)
potty etiquette : bathroom etiquette (8)
Atlanta Vacation (8)
March 2010
January 2010
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
Chatter
Chickamauga Lock Project
Computer
Ed Bryant for Senate
Environment
Family
Fox Den Lane
GulfShore Baptist Assembly
Homebrew
Hurricane Katrina
Movies
Music of New Orleans
National Lampoon's European Vacation
Now Discover Your Strengths
Opinion
Politics
quotes
Recipes
Religion
Search
Signs
Things to do in Chattanooga
Torchbearers
Work
Faith Well Grounded
Jason
Beck
Brandywine Books
OfficeSpam
The Dawn Treader
beulah land
motherhood monologue
TulipGirl
Chair of Bowlies
Danny Sullivan
Sit With Me Awhile
Harrison Farm
Uglyhead
In the Lion's Den
Who cares!
Markchop
Capernwray Hall
Daveo
Riskey Busines
His Hill
Vin
Lisa
Holsby Brunn
Dawnuella
Dave & Susan
Viatical Life Settlements
Marriage Laws
Obama Blog
Link Directory
Serpentine Belt Diagram
What Do Snails Eat
How to Move
What Do Frogs Eat
What Do They Eat
Section 8 Housing List
Marriage License Requirements
Sanibel Island Hotels
Section 8 Application
low income apartments for rent
An Accidental Blog
Baylyblog: Out of our minds, too
Blog on the Lillypad
bLogicus
Bobby's Blog
Brandywine Books
Brittle Crazy Glass
Cacoethes Scribendi
opossum
Carrifex
Confessions of a Political Junkie
Considerable Grace
Darin M. Stone
Dawn Treader
Dignan's 75 Year Plan
Dimly Lit
DMC News
eMinistry Notes
Evangelical Diablog
even when my heart is . . . blogging
Every Blog Needs a Title
Existential Space
FirstFloorFlat
From the Front Lines
Full Force Gale
Gideon Strauss
Got Doctrine
Granitepeaks
Grantian Florilegium - George Grant
Green Baggins
Half Pint House
Heretical Orthodoxy
Hey Nonny Nonny
infinite improbability
Intellectual Defenestration
Irate Nate's Weblog
iWestminster
J. D. Wetterling
Jack Yoest
Jollyblogger
Junkmail for Blankets
Kingdom Agenda
Le Sabot Post Moderne
lenscleanse
Life Under the Sun
Little Miss Reformed
Metaschema
Mine and Thine
Nihil Sine Deo
No Grasp of Your Reality
Not Another Blog
Now I don't want to get off on a rant here . . .
Nowheresville, USA
Oh me of Little Faith
Out of Egypt
PalmTree Pundit
Physics Geek Jesus Freak
Pilgrim At Ashley Avenue
PlanetGraham
plodblog
Postscript Posthaste
Problems are For Solving
Provocative Church
Pruitt Communications
Reasoned Audacity - Charmaine Yoest
Reformed Blacks of America
Reformed Chicks Blabbing
Reformed Ruminations
Reformed Women
renaej6's xanga site
Rob's Place: Orangejack Blog
Sacra Doctrina
Sacred Journey
Scott's Simple Story
Second Drafts
See Life Differently
Seminary Tychicus
Slaves of Righteousness
Sola Fide - Justified by Faith Alone in Christ Alone
Subcurrents Coast to Coast
Sword Saints
The 522
The Banty Rooster
The Kingdom - Greersights
The Last Homely House
The Lion Rampant
The Official Zavablog
The Parchment
The Round Table
Theologian
This Classical Life
To Live is Christ and To Die is Gain
Tolle, Blogge
Twenty Someone
Wayfaring Pilgrim
What a Rummy Nation
Wittenberg Gate
Writer Mom
Writings of an Exceptional Being
May 01, 2007
Zephaniah 3:17
January 26, 2007
door to door evangelism
Sharon over at sit with me awhile has some thoughts on door to door evangelism. Pop on over and have a read.December 10, 2006
thoughts
I find myself ever more in the pursuit of finding God's love. Whether in the mundane, tragic, ghastly, simple, remote, or busy events of life his love is ever present. At times it is hard to find, but it is there. Sometimes it is loud and evident and other times eerily quite. But the God who in geneses, broke on the scene with quite walks with us in Eden and who in Mathew came to us with peace on earth and good will toward men, is here on this planet pouring out his love and mercies. I'm not entirely sure why God has pursed me with such love and blessings, but as a Christian it is my privileged obligation to whole heartedly focus on his love. This pursuit of his love is something I have missed my whole Christian life, but is now something I refuse to put down. God is love and they will know we are of him because of our love. Not our persuasive words, are clean theology, our inclusive clamor, no they will know we are his because we love.
You see the reason I am not living a life that is drenched in the realization of God's love is because as a fallen creature I am inherently self focused-- pursuing the things of this earth. With that misdirected thought process I miss the love of God at most every step; until of course during those times self focus God reaches through in a lovingly overbearing way and shows me anew his loving kindness, which then I am forced to ponder his goodness. At those times my heart sees his provision and I instinctively praise him. But because we do not set our minds to pursue his love we lose the vision of his love within days.
Our highest calling from Christ is to love the Lord our God with all our heart mind and spirit. But who are we loving? We are loving Love. Yes love. God is love. That is who he is in all his great unspeakable glory. All of who He is can be wrapped up in one seemingly simple word: Love.
With that said may I restart the process of fulfilling Christ's greatest command. "Love the Lord with all your heart with all your mind and all your soul."
I wrote this to myself on February 04th 2006. I thankfully found it tonight, just when I needed it.
Again, my comments are still down..... Someone remind me to get with my host about it.... :-)
July 13, 2006
Celebrating Ezzo week
TulipGirl is blogging about Ezzo week. Please stop by her blog and take a few minutes to read some of her posts. Here are two links (1 2)
This reading is not just for new parents. Make sure you know who Ezzo is so that when he and his books are brought up in conversations at church you will be able to speak intelligently about topics such as Failure to Thrive, Loss of Milk Production, Lies about Family beds (remember they use to call SIDs "Crib Death" for a reason), Cry it out, and Gary Ezzo's 2 Excommunications
Back when I went to school up at Ravencrest one of the guest speakers had a saying that still resonates with me to this day. He said: "Rules without relationship leads to rebellion". One of my biggest beefs with Ezzo is that he focuses on the rules and behavior and thus lets the relationship take the backseat. Remember that God says "...with loving-kindness I have drawn you" Jeremiah 31:3b. One easy question that we should ask while rearing our kids is: Am I drawing my kids into a relationship with me and by proxy into relationship with God, through loving-kindness? I think ultimately you could ask yourself: Am I parenting my children the way that God parents me?
Though, the problem with my last question is that a lot of Christians are so busy punishing, chastising, disciplining, and belittling themselves that they don't have a clue how God parents them. All they know is what their legalism tells them, not what God in his word has told them. Yes, it ain't pretty.
June 17, 2006
Scientology
The truth about Scientology that ole Tom would not want you to know.April 27, 2006
It says I am a Reformed Evangelical
![]() | You scored as Reformed Evangelical. You are a Reformed Evangelical. You take the Bible very seriously because it is God's Word. You most likely hold to TULIP and are sceptical about the possibilities of universal atonement or resistible grace. The most important thing the Church can do is make sure people hear how they can go to heaven when they die.
What's your theological worldview? created with QuizFarm.com |
Hat Tip to Daniel over at In the Lion's Den for the link to the quiz.
March 24, 2006
What the HECK!
Take the time to read the letter below the fold. What a load of garbage, and the fact that they actually got 10,000 clergy members to sign it is a complete outrage. Really!
Here is a little quote:
Here's another:
Let me interpret what they just said: If you don't believe in evolution you are not using your mind and in effect rejecting God.
Again, what the heck.
March 21, 2006
Isaiah 55:9
As the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways and my thoughts than your thoughts. (N.I.V)
February 24, 2006
That's what I'm talking about!
We can hope and pray that this is the beginning of the end.December 12, 2005
Let me be honest
My dad every year tends to give us self-help books for Christmas. I think it tends to conjure up a bit of angst on the part of all of us kids for one reason or the other. I would bet just about all the money in the world that I am the only one of my siblings that actually reads the books he gives. The main reason I read the books is not because I want to "get better", but because I want to honor my dad and respect him in the position God has placed him in. Yes, I realize that I am 30+ years old, but I still feel God has placed him in my life and that part of honoring the position Christ has placed him in is to accept his leadership.
All of that said my parents were passing through on Saturday and dad gave me one of my Christmas presents early. He gave me Joel Osteen's book Daily Readings from Your Best Life. I have to admit that I am not excited about it at all, but as usual I am going to read it. The problem is that I am so cynical about the whole Christian 7 step books. I have really begun to dislike popular Christian fad books. You know, the let me chop it up and feed it to you on a rubber baby spoon kind of Christian books.
Well, since this is a devotional book Leslie and I are going to read it together. Last night was our first night. It was pretty good. The first devotion had to do with Hebrews 11 and faith. He used the Hebrews faith passage to talk about following God by faith to wherever He has called us. His point was God either puts a drive in our heart like Abrahams father to go to Canaan (promise land) or a direct call in our lives like he did with Abraham. The problem is that like Abrahams father, we get comfortable at some point in our journey and settle in a land that is nice but not everything God has intended for us. Olsteen's call was for us to continue the journey we started. That we should take the land He has given us, and that we should not grow complacent with what God has already blessed us with.
All in all it was a good read. Leslie and I had some interesting discussions afterwards. But truthfully, there is something about books like this that rub me the wrong way. Dad says it is my inner negative self talk that has conditioned me to fight positive influence in my life. There is probably some truth to his point. I think part of my legalistic sensibilities just stops me from drinking in God's grace and blessings in my life. Am I the only one or am I just over thinking it?
November 30, 2005
speaking in tongues
Daniel over at In the Lion's Den did a little post about the Southern Baptist Convention's International Mission Board forbidding missionaries from speaking in tongues. Southern Baptist or not, I would be interested in hearing some of your comments on it. If you have a chance, then jump on over toDaniel's site and leave your two cents.
fyi....I'm turning off comments on this one.
November 21, 2005
hanging out where the goldfish are edible
It was our turn to help out with children's church this past Sunday. Leslie was with Elliot in the crawlers and I was with John David in the 3 year old's (give or take 6 months) class. In an effort to help us find our spiritual gifts and to develop a heart for the childrens ministry our church has all the members take turns helping with children's church. I'm certain what my primary (if there is such a thing as a primary) spiritual gift is, and I can tell you emphatically it has nothing to do with helping out with 12 three year olds for an hour. To be honest it probably has to do with me being lazy, but 12 three year olds require a level of energy that I am just not capable of mustering up.
The first time I realized that the hour was going to be a long time was after I had read three books, played legos (check out this link) for a while, and resolved four or five tug-o-war\toy disputes only to look up and see that 20 minutes had passed. Luckily they have this thing, which is oddly missing in the adult service called "snack time". I'm considering going before the next meeting of the session to get the scoop on what happened to snack time. Well, after a little song\prayer snack time began. It kept them occupied for another 10 minutes or more.
I guess I am totally out of the loop because I did not know the words to the snack time prayer song. The funny thing is that another parent happened to walk in right before the song prayer began and jumped right in. I think John David and I were just amused by all the little kids folding their hands and singing. To be quite honest I kind of felt like I did the time or two when I visited a catholic church. You know, not sure when to stand, sit or kneel. Yea, it is kind of an odd feeling to have in a PCA church.
Well, it was while they were eating their goldfish and fruit drops that I pulled out my camera. I'm going to have to keep the camera in mind going forward because as soon as I pulled it out they totally became mesmerized by it. I had to hold the camera way above my head in order to get them all in the shot, so I was not able to get a really good shot. John David is at the top right.
Yea back to the service. After snack time the dipper changes started. Luckily, due to some insurance reasons only women are allowed to change diapers. Normally I would think about raising Cain because of the inequality issues, but I decided to let this one go. ;-) By the time half of the most critical diapers were changed it was time to start cleaning up. I guess the real problem with the whole morning was that we were suppose to get to a bible story, but just ran out of time. I'm not sure it is a realistic possibility that 12 three year olds would all sit at the same time much less sit and listen to a short bible story. I mean, you are really dealing with a 15 second attention span. Well, maybe a bit longer if you are lucky enough to have one or two daze off into outer space for a bit.
November 14, 2005
playbook for the reformed
Here's a play straight out of the Calvinistic playbook for lovers: here
I used it on Leslie this morning. She swooned. Okay not exactly swooned, but I did get a good smile out of her.
October 27, 2005
those poor babies goldfish
How can you care more about the eye sight of goldfish than you do about unborn children? I just don't get it.
I tracked down this interesting article on abortion statistics in Italy. Here is a quote that I find really surprising.
There do appear to be some subpopulations in which abortion rates are higher: women with children, those with lower levels of education, and housewives.
I wonder if abortion is higher for the same subgroups here in the US. It is hard to believe that mothers and housewives would be those who abort the most.
I know I have said it before but I really hate abortion. I wish there was something I could do about it.
October 20, 2005
Gandhi vs. Christ
| The various religions are like different roads converging on the same point. What difference does it make if we follow different routes, provided we arrive at the same destination. -- Mahatma Gandhi |
I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. -- Christ |
October 10, 2005
Halloween or not......II
Here is a little more reading on Halloween. Be sure to check out the comments as well. Both are pro Halloween. Yeah, the first quote would make you think he was against the holiday but he is not. The second quote is from a blog I don't visit often enough. I like his point -- that something which has bad beginning does not have to have a bad ending. I think his point really speaks to the nature of Christ.
From Baylyblog
From Nowhereville, USA
He makes some really good points. What does peek my interest, whether rightly or not, is that in his holiday breakout none of his holidays have any religious significance to him. Maybe I am reading a bit too much into it. I guess his "A time to enjoy friends and family through shared traditions" could also encompass any religious traditions.
Like Daniel brought up in his last comment on the Halloween or not…… post I think it is important for me as an evangelical to tie religious meaning to most if not all of my holidays I celebrate. I think it is a natural out flowing of the significance of holidays to God in the Old Testament. I do see a difference in the OT holidays, which all pointed to Christ and our modern day holidays, but where those ties in our holidays are easily made shouldn't they be?
October 01, 2005
Halloween or not....
There was a point in time where Leslie and I gave out candy and the like at Halloween, but we always kind of questioned whether Halloween was a holiday that we should celebrate as Christians. The last time we did give out candy we has some idiot (I only call them an idiot because it was a hit and run) ran into our mailbox while trying to back out of our drive way, so we decided the next year not to give out candy and for some reason we just never have again.
But, now that we have two little ones we are going to have to settle the issue once and for all. Over at Carol's Storybook she presents Halloween from a perspective I had not heard.
So what do you think, will you be handing out goodies?
September 07, 2005
new old blog
If you are looking for a new blog to follow then While You Were Away is back. He and his wife are teaching English in China. I followed their blog when they were in China the last time. They will be there for a year, and have just started their teaching stint. He does not allow commenting on his blog for obvious reasons. Check them out.August 10, 2005
Parental Rights vs. Public Schools
Here is an extremely disturbing article on how far Ted Kennedy's home state will go to suppress the rights of those parents who feel that public schools should not usurp the their role of teaching personal values to children.
Thanks Eric
If the link to the artical is no longer valid then you can read the artical below.Wednesday, August 10, 2005
By Wendy McElroy
David Parker (search) of Lexington, Mass., is scheduled to go on trial on Sept. 21 for asking his son's public school to provide parental notification before discussing homosexuality with the 6-year old.
The actual charge is criminal trespassing. But the real issue is whether parents or schools will control the teaching of values to children.
The conflict began on Jan. 17, when Parker's then-5-year-old son brought home a Diversity Bookbag from kindergarten. Included was Robert Skutch's "Who's In a Family?" that depicts families headed by same-sex couples. Parker had wanted to decide for himself the timing and manner in which his son was introduced to the subject of homosexuality.
(The Bookbag is supposed to be a voluntary program but the Parkers knew nothing about it in advance.)
Parker immediately e-mailed the Estabrook school principal, Joni Jay (search). Parker expressed his belief that gay parents did not constitute "a spiritually healthy family"; he did not wish his son to be taught that a gay family is "a morally equal alternative to other family constructs."
Parker acknowledged the equal rights of gays but objected to "the 'out of the closet' and into the kindergarten classroom mentality." In essence, Parker highlighted the difference between tolerance, which acknowledges someone's right to make a choice, and acceptance, which is the personal validation of that choice.
The conflict moved quickly from the Diversity Bookbag (search) to the more general issue of parental notification. The Parkers wanted to know if sexuality was scheduled to be discussed in class so they could remove their son. They also wanted their son removed from any "spontaneous conversations" about sexuality that involved an adult.
By law, Massachusetts requires schools to notify parents when sexuality is scheduled for discussion. Lexington School Committee chairman Thomas B. Griffiths explained, "We don't view telling a child that there is a family out there with two mommies as teaching about homosexuality." In an e-mail, the Estabrook school principal stated, "I have confirmed … that discussion of differing families, including gay-headed families, is not included in the parental notification policy."
At an April 27 meeting at the school, Parker refused to leave without an assurance that he would receive parental notification. Arrested for criminal trespass, he spent the night in jail.
When asked why he insisted on staying, Parker replied, "I wanted to see how far they [school authorities] would go for [my] asking something simple."
The state now wishes to impose probation upon Parker, along with other restrictions — such as banning him from Lexington school properties without prior written permission from the superintendent of schools. This means he is barred from places to vote, as well as school committee and parent-teacher meetings.
Parker is contesting the charge. Why? After his arraignment, he stated, "I'm just trying to be a good dad." During a May 11 appearance on the FOX News Channel's "The O'Reilly Factor," Parker expanded on this statement, saying that he wanted his son "to play on the swing set and make mud pies. I don't want him thinking about same-sex unions in kindergarten."
Parker's attorney, Jeffrey Denner, points to a larger issue — "the role of family and what kind of encroachments government can make into children's and people's lives."
Otherwise stated, schools are usurping the parental role of teaching personal values to children. They are not acting as educators but as guardians, "in loco parentis" (in the place of a parent). Some schools clearly consider this function to be their right, even over parental objections. Thus, Estabrook defends its "right" to teach Parker's son to accept same-sex marriages.
Denner hopes to resolve the conflict before trial but he also intends to file a civil suit in federal court against the town of Lexington, the school system and its officials.
Meanwhile, there seems to be a campaign to discredit Parker. The Lexington School Board has reportedly accused Parker of wanting to be arrested to grab "headlines." If true, it is strange that he wasted months on e-mails, faxes and school meetings before making his move. Parker's actions sound more like those of a father with no options left.
The school also claims that Parker's demands would prevent other children from discussing their families or drawing pictures of them.
But this is far from what's been officially requested. According to Neil Tassel, Parker's co-counsel, "the Parkers' proposal was simple: notify them in advance if there is a planned discussion about same-sex issues, and, if an adult becomes involved in a discussion spontaneously begun by a child, then remove their child from the discussion."
School authorities quite reasonably responded that they could not be held responsible for monitoring spontaneous conversations or remarks made in the class. Moreover, they contend that children with gay parents have a right to talk about their families and have their families represented.
At some point in the dialogue, however, reason broke down; police were called. The attacks on Parker have been so intense that Tassel recently found it necessary to write a defense in the local paper denying that his client is a shill for or member of Article 8, a controversial organization opposed to same-sex marriage.
He pointed to Parker's Ph.D. to deflect criticism of his client as an ignorant book burner. To counter the charge that Parker hates gays, Tassel described him as "an exceptionally kind hearted man" whose best friend was gay.
Perhaps Estabrook authorities are trying to divert attention from the real question: Is Parker simply demanding parental notification or not? I think he is.
David Parker cares so deeply that he is willing to go to jail and endure a lengthy court process for the right to be a parent. In a world where a myriad of social problems can be traced back to parental abuse or indifference, it is incredible that Parker is being treated as a criminal and not as the hero he is.
Wendy McElroy is the editor of ifeminists.com and a research fellow for The Independent Institute in Oakland, Calif. She is the author and editor of many books and articles, including the new book, "Liberty for Women: Freedom and Feminism in the 21st Century" (Ivan R. Dee/Independent Institute, 2002). She lives with her husband in Canada.
July 26, 2005
old photo
My Aunt Sandy came across this picture and sent it my way via e-mail. She saw where I had mentioned the CBMC conference that my parents were headed to teach. The South East CBMC conference use to be held at Covenant Collage up until the mid 80's or so, and this picture is of me back in 1977 at the age of three standing in front of Covenant College.
Thank for the picture Sandy!
June 14, 2005
2005 General Assembly
For all those PCAers out there this link might be of interest. The 2005 General Assembly is in ole Chatt this week and the kind folks over at Coptix are hosting a blog. Go check it out.May 17, 2005
he called me a fundie
Talk about little things that can make your day.
I'm the head of "one of those Bush-loving Christian fundie families:"
April 30, 2005
Hugo's Christian Business idea
Okay since I am digging a hole (no pun intended) in regards to google and my bathroom related hits, I have a blog post you need to read. Check out Hugo Fitch's post on a new business idea he has. I have to admit, I would buy into his business idea for at least one roll. Go check it out.March 31, 2005
a sick man in a sick world
Schindlers' spiritual advisers said the couple had been at their daughter's besides minutes before the end came, but were not there at the moment of her death because Michael Schiavo did not want them in the room.
"And so his heartless cruelty continues until this very last moment," said the Rev. Frank Pavone.
March 22, 2005
terri's death
Here is a link on death by dehydration from the Catholic Educator's Resource Center.
Excerpt:February 03, 2005
gay marriage
I had originally written this as a comment on this blog, but my comment was too long.
For me it all boils down to there being unalienable and alienable rights. Our founding fathers saw this distinction also and created a system of government that protected these non transferable rights, those being life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
I think the founders chose life as the first unalienable right to mention in their Declaration of Independence because it is the core right given to us by God. God initiated the institution of marriage as the spring that life would flow from.
Once moving past their declaration of independence the founders set forth to write a Constitution and a Bill of Rights which were intended to be the ideal system for those unalienable rights to flourish. I don?t think the founders ever envisioned that the institution of marriage, which produced the core unalienable right, would be in danger. They would not have seen a need to protect that institution partly because man invents new ways to commit sin (Romans 1:30). If they had seen that the institution that produced life would have been in danger, I have no doubt that it would have been address. Does anyone know if gay marriage has been attempted by any other culture that proceeded the last 500 years? I would be surprised if they did.
As a Christian, and yes I know not all Christian agree with me on this, I have a requirement to stand for what Christ stands for, marriage being one of those things. Out side of that fact common sense requires that I look ahead to see what the side effect of gay marriage would be. One of those side effects would be polygamy. Both issues have to be addressed at the same time. I know that the gay lobby calls it a red herring to bring in polygamy, but the red herring is theirs. Both issues are involved here and have to be address.
This post was one of my favorite posts because we were able to carry on a great discussion about a hot topic. I am not sure about Texas marriage laws but maybe one day they will have more content.
August 25, 2004
aborting my marriage
Salon.com had an article that is worth the read (I think). I?m not total sure what my feelings were after reading it. I think I was just left with the impression of how sad and wrong life can go and to think that for a lot of people they just have no hope.Oh yea, you have to watch a little commercial to read the article, but it is worth it.
Also, I am probably not the only one following this story but it really makes me angry, especially after reading the artical on aborting my marriage. If you are not familiar with the Women on Waves ship then you might want to read up on it. Here are some links about it:
BBC
Life News
New Zealand Herald
July 29, 2004
dirty politics
I have really made a concerted effort to lay off the political blogging here lately, but I just have to speak up on this one. When I went to Kerry-04.org I was struck by the picture of Kim Jong-il, Osama, and Sadam with the question asked "This November who would they vote for". Without a doubt they would vote for Kerry. Am I wrong about that? People might call Bush a hot head, war-hawk or something else, but at this point in our nations history I feel much safer having Bush in the WH.
On the other hand I don?t think this site helps convince non-bushies to vote for him. If you are going to present truths about Kerry's short comings to try and convince people who they should vote for, then I don?t think mocking Kerry while doing it is helpful in your cause. Though, political cartoons have been a part of our nation?s history going back to the colonist, so maybe I?m wrong.
One last thing: I just love the political process in this country. Every 4 years I look forward to the conventions and hearing what everyone has to say. The Democratic convention has been quite interesting. There have been several really good speeches and other that should have been left out. I think they should have dropped Gore from the speech line up. I think the Dems already have their base fired up and if anything they turned off some potential voters with his speech. I really wanted to catch Clinton the first night, but it came on way too late and I missed it. I am not sure why they had him come on so late, but I guess there was some reason. I might have to find his speech on-line somewhere. I love watching his speeches because I could always count on him to get my ire up. Well, that?s not the only reason. There is something about the man I find extremely fascinating.
Carters? speech was the best I have seen so far. After Carters speech I would have gotten up to go early vote if I were one of those people that needed all of their ?opinions? feed to them?.Heinz-Kerry?s speech was probably the worst.
July 12, 2004
the quiz
There are two issues that make me vote the way I do. They are the sanctity of life and the sanctity of marriage. It is funny that the way I vote boils down to the 2nd chapter of Genesis. In that chapter God does two things. He breaths his breath of life into man and creates the institution of marriage. For me the most important thing I can do is to work to protect those two base institutions.
If my vote did not count as much as it could this election, I would really consider throwing my vote to a Libertarian.
If you take the quiz and feel like sharing then feel free to post a comment.
July 04, 2004
Religion or Politics
Thinking about Independence day In one of my other posts I uploaded a letter that I sent to Senator Alexander. I was not sure which category to place it under: religion or politics. I decided to post it using multiple categories, which got me thinking that posting the letter under both categories lacked a certain amount of political correctness. After thinking about it a bit my conclusion was that if the founding fathers could not differentiate their Religion from Politics, then why should I?Take a look at what the founders said in the Declaration of Independence. They understood that rights did not originate from laws or government, but rights ultimately came from God. In the Declaration of Independence it states: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights. The founders understood something that most of us don't. They understood that if the ultimate statement of rights came from the government then they would have had absolutely no right to oppose the rule of the king. Instead they clearly understood that rights originated from God and were endowed upon them by Him. They had no problem standing up to the king and claiming what they had already given.
All that said today I am going to post this under the religion and politics categories, and then thank God for them both.
June 18, 2004
sanctity of marriage
A few days ago I wrote Senator Alexander. I have a lot to say about his respones and I hope to get back to this post in the future.I noticed on your website that you had a great picture of you with the late President Reagan. I had the opportunity to hear President Reagan speak at the 1988 Republican National Convention as well as the opportunity to read and listen to many of his speeches. Reagan never wavered on his commitment to traditional family values, and I am disturbed that you have. By turning down the opportunity to co-sponsor the marriage amendment bill, you have actively failed to represent the constituents that voted you into office. At this critical point in our nation?s history, we do not need politicians that give technical and complicated run-a-round answers instead of a simple yes or no. By refusing to co-sponsor this bill, you have voted NO to the sanctity of marriage, and by doing so, have failed to represent the constituents that voted you into office.
Sincerely,
J. David Gidcumb
June 17, 2004
Mr. J. David Gidcumb
214 Signal View St.
Red Bank, Tennessee 37415
Dear David,
Thank you for getting in touch with me regarding a constitutional amendment outlawing same-sex marriage.
I believe marriage should be between a man and a woman. That is the law today in Tennessee. In addition, the federal Defense of Marriage Act, enacted in 1996, gives Tennessee the right to enforce our definition of marriage even if other states adopt a different view. Since same-sex marriages are already outlawed in Tennessee, I have not yet been persuaded that it is also necessary to amend the Constitution. The Constitution of the United States has served our country well for more than 200 years. I believe it should not be tampered with unless absolutely necessary. If a federal court somehow took away Tennessee's right to enforce our law defining marriage as between a man and a woman, I would certainly then support a constitutional amendment restoring that right.
Thank you very much for writing.
Sincerely,
Lamar
June 12, 2004
God's Sovereignty
Right now I am reading through The Sovereignty of God by AW Pink. I started the book several years back, and have just picked it up again. I have done quite a bit, more then some but less then others, of reading over the last 10 or so years that I have been a Christian, but I have not run into anyone who is as well thought out as Pink. I think Pink is not read as much as be should be because of his English\King James use of old English. Though, it is really not that bad.I have been struck, while reading this book, by one prevailing though. Every Christian I know would tell me that God is sovereign, but I don?t think they truly believe it or don?t know what they are really agreeing to. I don?t want to say anything else about my previous sentence because that is not why I am writing this blog entry. I am in the chapter five: The Sovereignty of God in Salvation. The chapter is broken out into section, and I want to just post some of the section on The Sovereignty of God the Son in Salvation.
Pink said this:
I am not really going to comment on what he said. I think he speaks for himself. What I do want to say is while reading this I was reminded for the verse that Billy Graham gave to President Bush to read during Reagan's funeral which was:
22 For such as be blessed of him shall inherit the earth; and they that be cursed of him shall be cut off.
23 The steps of a good man are ordered by the LORD: and he delighteth in his way.
24 Though he fall, he shall not be utterly cast down: for the LORD upholdeth him with his hand.
June 07, 2004
living an eternally significant life
Well on the 3rd I turned 30. I have to say that I am starting to feel old. I really did not think 30 would be a big deal. My wife turned 30 on the 13th of May, so I had a few weeks to think about what it would be like for me to turn 30. I kept thinking that turning 25 would be a much bigger deal then 30. I mean, at 25 you are a quarter century which is half way to 50. My thinking that 25 was a big deal and that 30 would be nothing has just not panned out that way.
I guess I started college about 6 years later then the average person, so all through my college years I hung out with people younger then myself. That being the case I always felt that I was younger then I actually was. Even now, most of the people I would call close friends are 5 years younger than me. All that said, I was thinking this morning about Ronald Reagan?s death and the finality of life. I was thinking about all the great things he achieved and how history would remember him as a great man. I guess some where deep down I always had some illusions of grandeur about how my life would turn out. Not that this is the end of my life, but I do suspect that I will not achieve some of the lofty goals\ideas I had about where I would end up.
After a bit of thought, I think I am okay with that. I realize that my goals were more about me then Him.
I guess this is where I confront that recurring theme in my life of living an eternally significant life.


