gid

September 05, 2008

Calling all Philosophy Majors

For several months I have, not so secretly, wondered how to help others get out of this neo-federalist thought process that both parties are stuck in. I feel strongly about the revival of a more pure and historical constructionist view of the constitution needing to take root.

The problem is that it took me years (3-10) of reading and studying history to finally be open to the possibility that the reality be presented and the arguments being made in our current political paradigm are a result of, for the lack of a better term, us having lost our way.

All that said, Blackburn, Jason, and myself were on the way back from lunch today, and we were talking about politics when Jason brought up a principle or study he had heard of that basically goes like this: New concepts, to which someone has little or no reference point, take time to introduce or else the person will think they are either silly or misguided and will dismiss them out of hand.

Does anyone know what this principle is called? I'm sure this principle is covered in a freshman philosophy class, but for the life of me I can't seem to pin it down.

I am kind of working with these keywords: conceptual change pedagogy and knowledge reconstruction

Please, someone fill me in. I really would like to understand this concept a bit better.

Posted by gid at September 5, 2008 02:16 PM
Comments

Good to see you blogging again! I enjoy your sister's blog very much also!

Posted by: SANDY at September 7, 2008 04:25 PM

I can not answer your question but it is a very common reaction.
Of course I see it more in the Spiritual because that is where my mind goes.
There are basic foundational truths that the church as a body has drifted away from. New reality and new "truths" have replaced what is right and true. And so when what was spoken of by prophets of old is brought up....it is passed over as old thinking. Sad.
I'll post a portion of what you posted and see if someone can come up with an answer for you.

Posted by: Sharon at September 14, 2008 10:44 PM

Perhaps what you're describing is cognitive dissonance. The situation reminds me of the pie of knowledge, and that people are comfortable with ignorance - or unaware of what they think they know but don't, and what they don't know they don't know, etc.

It takes a tremendous effort to build a lexicon up around someone's unfamiliar assertion. That assertion may draw upon a different philosophy than your own, and it's likely that similar words and phrases have vastly different meanings and values attributed to them.

This will likely make someone feel uncomfortable if you suggest that, say, neo-conservatives are bad, to a traditional conservative.

That's because they might not understand the term well enough, but may understand 'conservative' and may take offense to the perceived slight to the group they affiliate with. Ideas shouldn't be offensive...

A true intellectual can appreciate an assertion someone makes by placing it into a logical context by making an effort to understand where the idea comes from and how it benefits the individual, their family, society, etc. Which frameworks does the assertion fit into, and which is the person using?

There are also strategies that people employ to deal with cognitive dissonance, ideas, and philosophy in general. Check out the bottom of the page at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_dissonance

I could over simplify the problem and suggest that people would rather be comfortable and develop strategies to manage ideas, which range from a scientific strategy, to a fundamentalist strategy, etc. There can be positive benefits to accepting perceived contradictions - but only if you follow through to understand the logical framework for each. This is bewildering to some and inappropriately used by others.

By the way, http://www.bulliondirect.com/ and http://www.honeyvillegrain.com/ are your friend. Totally unrelated. :)

Posted by: Andy Duncan at September 24, 2008 11:54 AM
Post a comment









Please Enter Number:



Remember personal info?