gid

September 13, 2005

another one from Ben Stein

More from Ben Stein: the more I read the writing of Ben Stein the more I like him.
Click here to read it from its source. Also, here is a link to the last post I did on a Ben Stein piece monday night at morton's
Thanks for the link Jon.
More on Katrina
By Ben Stein
Published 9/12/2005 12:11:44 AM by The American Spectator

Fact: Katrina was a devastating storm. It left terrible damage to innocent people's lives and to property throughout the Gulf South.

Fact: There have been other storms as damaging and some far more damaging. What, then, is different about this storm? Here are a few tentative thoughts.

First, the incompetence of the local and state authorities in Louisiana and especially New Orleans was breathtaking. To issue a mandatory evacuation order without providing means of transport is almost criminally irresponsible. To take citizens to shelters where they would be beaten, robbed, and raped, and to provide no police protection for them was astoundingly incompetent. To allow armed gangs to shoot at rescuers was almost beyond belief.

Second, the response of the federal government is described as slow, and it was slow at first. But can anyone name a natural disaster in which more federal troops, supplies, and money have been dispatched as quickly as they have been done in this disaster? Bush's response has not been unusually bad, but amazingly powerful and swift. In other hurricanes, survivors have been left for weeks on their own. In Katrina's case, the whole affected area has been covered with money and aid and troops to restore order on a scale and with speed never seen before.

Third, the networks and newspapers have been quick to cry racism because so many of the victims were black. This is total nonsense. New Orleans is a mostly black city. Obviously, most of the victims of the storm would be black. No one has been able to point to a single instance in which black victims were mistreated because of their race by whites. In fact, just the opposite has happened. The whole story is of rescues and salvation by people of all races aimed at people of all races. In a gesture never seen before, the whole heart of the nation has taken in poor, bereft black families and sheltered them absolutely without regard to race. This is a mirror of the basic goodness of Americans and the disappearance of racism as an acceptable action basis of American life. It is also a measure of the total absence of racism in the heart of George W. Bush. The media may play this as a story of race versus race, but that is pure incendiary fantasy, and dangerous nonsense.

What is the real story of Katrina is (I suggest) not so much that nature wrought fury on land, water, people, property, and animals, not at all anything about racism, not much about federal government incompetence. The real story is that the mainstream media rioted.

They used the storm and its attendant sorrows to continue their endless attack on George W. Bush. Wildly inflated stories about the number of dead and missing, totally made up old wives' tales of racism, breathless accounts of Bush's neglect that are utterly devoid of truth and of historical context -- this is what the mainstream media gave us. The use of floating corpses, of horror stories of plagues, the sad faces of refugees, the long-faced phony accusations of intentional neglect and racism -- anything is grist for the media's endless attempts to undermine the electorate's choice last November. It is sad, but true that the media will use even the most heart breaking truths -- and then add total inventions -- to try to weaken and then evict from office a man who has done nothing wrong, but has instead turned himself inside out to help the real victims.

In the meantime, George Bush does not lash out, does not attack those who falsely accuse him of the most horrible acts and neglect. Instead, he doggedly goes on helping the least among us. I don't know how he does it, but we are very lucky he does. As for truth, it eventually may be salvaged from the flooded neighborhoods of The Crescent City, but not as long as there is a lie to use to hurt an honest man trying to do the best he can, and hundreds of thousands of brave, tireless men and women who do more than point fingers and tell tales. The Katrina story is a disgrace to the people who are "reporting" it while pouring gasoline on a fire. They and their crusade against George Bush are the real stories, and they are dismal ones.

Posted by gid at September 13, 2005 09:36 AM
Comments

I think FEMA is racist and prejudiced...against people who work and pay taxes and don't mooch off the government. Heaven forbid SOME people do what is right. Everyone I have talked to or heard of, which has received help from FEMA is either a drunk with no job, collects "government cheese" (you know who you are) or lives "under-the-table" and does not contribute by paying taxes. At the same time, my mother, who is extremely hard-working, tax-paying to the point where she has absolutely NOTHING because she has a small child to care for who isn't even her's (another rant, another time), can't even get help from FEMA (what a joke) because she bought her hurricane supplies A DAY BEFORE the hurricane!!!! Nevermind that you had no power or running water for two weeks or had to wait in a two-hour line for gas so you could spend $25.00 a day to run a fan...or, my favorite... "were you mandatorily evacuated" "No." (Because we are less than one mile outside of the line of "mandatory evacuation", we decided to leave on our own accord). Since you left on your own accord,"You are not entitled to any assistance from FEMA."
The positive of this hurricane? We've gotten rid of a lot of garbage.
Sorry, David, I'll try not to comment so much next time.

Posted by: Heather at September 13, 2005 12:07 PM

Yea, that makes sense to give the responsible ones a hard time.

Posted by: gid at September 13, 2005 01:34 PM

Have you read Doug TenNapel's blog? I think you might like him. He's the creator of the "Catscratch" cartoon on Nickelodeon and has several books as well. Also very conservtive for Hollywood.

http://www.tennapel.com/

Posted by: brian at September 13, 2005 11:02 PM

Thanks for the link. No, I had not heard of Doug's or his blog. Thanks for the link he is quite interesting. I read his post on Answering a Letter From Michael Moore and am not totally sure what to think. I will have to check out his blog a bit more.

Posted by: gid at September 14, 2005 10:09 AM

I am responding to Ben Stein's argument on the fact that the media is attacking President Bush. Well, on behalf of everyone on the Mississippi Gulf Coast, I would like to say that you are full of it. There has been no exxagerations. We had to live with no water and no power for a long time. We had babies dehydrating and starving because FEMA was too "BUSY" with New Orleans. When we finally got some assistance, it took them forever just to come out and inspect our residencies. We had to live in a contaminated environment for about a month. And on top of that FEMA payed more attention to the people that did not need ANY assistance whatsoever!!!!!!!! Now, EVERYONE is still more concerned about LOUISIANA. What about MISSISSIPPI???????? And as for the Bush argument, well, he should stick to what he says he is going to do. We have pretty much been crapped on. Oh, another thing, we still have people living in tents in the cold weather. The out-of-state workers get better treatment than we do.

Posted by: Christina at February 21, 2006 01:14 PM

Christina,
I would agree that a lot of things could have been handled better.Christina,
I would agree that a lot of things could have been handled better, but for the most part I agree with Ben.

As for who got it worse, I don?t know. I do know that there are a lot of people in New Orleans who are not able to return to their homes and rebuild. Though I am surprised there are people living in tents. I really had not heard that that was still going on.

Posted by: gid at February 21, 2006 01:34 PM
Post a comment









Please Enter Number:



Remember personal info?